US v. Carl Blaise
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:01-cr-00371-CMH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999638020]. Mailed to: Carl Blaise and Dennis Kennedy. [15-6431]
Appeal: 15-6431
Doc: 9
Filed: 08/11/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6431
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CARL BLAISE,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:01-cr-00371-CMH-1)
Submitted:
July 23, 2015
Decided:
August 11, 2015
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carl Blaise, Appellant
Assistant United States
Appellee.
Pro Se.
Attorney,
Dennis Michael Kennedy,
Alexandria, Virginia, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6431
Doc: 9
Filed: 08/11/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Carl
cases,
Blaise
the
seeks
defendant
to
appeal
must
file
his
the
sentence.
notice
fourteen days after the entry of judgment. *
4(b)(1)(A).
With
or
without
a
motion,
In
of
criminal
appeal
within
Fed. R. App. P.
upon
a
showing
of
excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an
extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal.
Fed.
R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353
(4th
Cir.
1985).
September 16, 2006.
2015.
The
district
court
entered
judgment
on
The notice of appeal was filed on March 16,
Because Blaise failed to file a timely notice of appeal
or to obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the
appeal.
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
DISMISSED
*
When Blaise’s criminal judgment was entered the appeal
period was ten days.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?