US v. Carl Blaise

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:01-cr-00371-CMH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999638020]. Mailed to: Carl Blaise and Dennis Kennedy. [15-6431]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6431 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/11/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6431 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CARL BLAISE, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cr-00371-CMH-1) Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: August 11, 2015 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl Blaise, Appellant Assistant United States Appellee. Pro Se. Attorney, Dennis Michael Kennedy, Alexandria, Virginia, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6431 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/11/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Carl cases, Blaise the seeks defendant to appeal must file his the sentence. notice fourteen days after the entry of judgment. * 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, In of criminal appeal within Fed. R. App. P. upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). September 16, 2006. 2015. The district court entered judgment on The notice of appeal was filed on March 16, Because Blaise failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. DISMISSED * When Blaise’s criminal judgment was entered the appeal period was ten days. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?