US v. Bryant Pride
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [999555482-2] Originating case number: 1:08-cr-00024-JPJ-RSB-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999658140]. Mailed to: Bryant Pride. [15-6435]
Appeal: 15-6435
Doc: 13
Filed: 09/11/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6435
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRYANT KELLY PRIDE, a/k/a Pride,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon.
James P. Jones, District
Judge. (1:08-cr-00024-JPJ-RSB-2)
Submitted:
September 9, 2015
Decided:
September 11, 2015
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bryant Kelly Pride, Appellant Pro Se.
Jennifer R. Bockhorst,
Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorneys, Mary Kathleen
Carnell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6435
Doc: 13
Filed: 09/11/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Bryant
Kelly
Pride
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction
of sentence. *
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
United States v. Pride, No. 1:08-cr-00024-JPJ-
RSB-2 (W.D. Va. filed Mar. 3, 2015; entered Mar. 4, 2015).
We
deny
of
as
unnecessary
appealability.
Pride’s
motion
for
a
certificate
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
*
Although Pride noted an appeal from the district court’s
order, he has proffered no argument on appeal specifying any
error by the district court in granting his motion.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?