US v. Bryant Pride

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [999555482-2] Originating case number: 1:08-cr-00024-JPJ-RSB-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999658140]. Mailed to: Bryant Pride. [15-6435]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6435 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/11/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6435 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRYANT KELLY PRIDE, a/k/a Pride, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00024-JPJ-RSB-2) Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 11, 2015 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bryant Kelly Pride, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorneys, Mary Kathleen Carnell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6435 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/11/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Bryant Kelly Pride appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. * error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pride, No. 1:08-cr-00024-JPJ- RSB-2 (W.D. Va. filed Mar. 3, 2015; entered Mar. 4, 2015). We deny of as unnecessary appealability. Pride’s motion for a certificate We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Although Pride noted an appeal from the district court’s order, he has proffered no argument on appeal specifying any error by the district court in granting his motion. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?