Jovan Simon v. Kevin Paige
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 9:13-cv-03025-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999627046]. Mailed to: Jovan Simon. [15-6446]
Appeal: 15-6446
Doc: 11
Filed: 07/24/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6446
JOVAN CORNELIUS SIMON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
L/CPL KEVIN PAIGE, SCHP; TROOPER BUCKY GEDDINGS, SCHP; L/CPL
MARK JENNINGS, SCHP; AGENT H. ERIC COHOON, ATF; SOUTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge.
(9:13-cv-03025-RMG)
Submitted:
July 21, 2015
Decided:
July 24, 2015
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jovan Cornelius Simon, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Bass Lohr, HOWELL,
GIBSON & HUGHES, PA, Beaufort, South Carolina; Barbara Murcier
Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6446
Doc: 11
Filed: 07/24/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jovan Cornelius Simon appeals the magistrate judge’s text
order denying his motion to compel and the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012),
and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971).
reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Simon v. Paige, No. 9:13-cv-03025-RMG
(D.S.C. Dec. 5, 2014; Mar. 13, 2015).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?