US v. Arthur Vick
Filing
OPINION/ORDER DIRECTING LIMITED REMAND filed by GSA, RLG and SDT [4CCA retains jurisdiction]. Originating case number: 5:11-cr-00352-BR-1,5:14-cv-00359-BR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: Arthur Vick. [999650381] [15-6457]
Appeal: 15-6457
Doc: 10
Filed: 08/31/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6457
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ARTHUR TRACY VICK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:11-cr-00352-BR-1; 5:14-cv-00359-BR)
Submitted:
August 27, 2015
Decided:
August 31, 2015
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Tracy Vick, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6457
Doc: 10
Filed: 08/31/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Arthur
Tracy
Vick
seeks
to
appeal
the
district
court’s
order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.
The
notice of appeal and motion for a certificate of appealability
were received
appeal
period.
appeal
is
in
the
district
Because
considered
court
Vick
filed
is
as
of
after
expiration
incarcerated,
the
date
it
the
of
notice
was
delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court.
the
of
properly
Fed. R.
App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).
The
record does not reveal when Vick gave the notice of appeal to
prison officials for mailing.
Accordingly, we remand the case
for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to obtain
this information from the parties and to determine whether the
filing was timely under Rule 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack.
The
record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for
further consideration.
REMANDED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?