Sharu Bey v. Warden Hollenbeck

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999612528-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999593825-2] Originating case number: 5:14-hc-02016-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999671942].. [15-6468]

Appeal: 15-6468

Doc: 16

Filed: 10/05/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6468

SHARU BEY,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
WARDEN HOLLENBECK,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-hc-02016-FL)

Submitted:

September 24, 2015

Decided:

October 5, 2015

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sharu Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6468

Doc: 16

Filed: 10/05/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Sharu Bey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without
prejudice.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis,

we

court.

affirm

Bey

v.

Feb. 27, 2015).
and dispense
contentions

the

Hollenbeck,

reasons
No.

stated

by

the

5:14-hc-02016-FL

district
(E.D.N.C.

We deny Bey’s motion for bail pending appeal

with
are

for

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2