Andrew Drayton, Jr. v. State

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [999671570-2] Originating case number: 0:14-cv-01548-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999749915]. Mailed to: Drayton. [15-6471]

Appeal: 15-6471

Doc: 19

Filed: 02/05/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6471

ANDREW DRAYTON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE, etc,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
Richard M. Gergel, District
Judge. (0:14-cv-01548-RMG)

Submitted:

January 21, 2016

Decided:

February 5, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Drayton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6471

Doc: 19

Filed: 02/05/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Andrew
accepting

the

dismissing

his

prejudice. *
error.

Drayton,

Jr.,

appeals

recommendation
42

U.S.C.

of

the

district

the

§ 1983

court’s

magistrate

(2012)

order

judge

complaint

and

without

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

Drayton v. State, No. 0:14-cv-01548-RMG (D.S.C.

July 3, 2014).

We deny Drayton’s motion to expedite as moot and

dispense

oral

with

contentions

are

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

This case has recently been returned to this court after a
limited remand for a timeliness determination.
The district
court has granted Drayton’s motion to reopen the appeal period.

2