Anthony Hoover v. State of North Carolina
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03220-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999658178]. Mailed to: Anthony Leon Hoover and Terrence Leroy Wright El. [15-6492]
Appeal: 15-6492
Doc: 21
Filed: 09/11/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6492
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER, a/k/a Anthony Leon Hoover El; TERRENCE
LEROY WRIGHT EL, as Moorish American Nationals,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
and
SAMUEL JUNIOR JACKSON; NAPOLEON J. RANKIN BEY; JAMES LEE
TROXLER EL; ERRICK L. BOWE; WEBSTER WALLER, a/k/a Webster
Waller Bey; MICHAEL HOLLIDAY; JAMES K. HOYLE BEY; MAURICE
HARTGROVE,
Plaintiffs,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Sub Jurisdiction Counties; NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03220-F)
Submitted:
September 9, 2015
Decided:
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
September 11, 2015
Appeal: 15-6492
Doc: 21
Filed: 09/11/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Anthony Leon Hoover; Terrence Leroy Wright, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-6492
Doc: 21
Filed: 09/11/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Leon Hoover and Terrence Leroy Wright El appeal the
district
court’s
order
dismissing
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
their
complaint
under
28
We have reviewed the record and
find that this appeal is frivolous.
Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Jackson v.
North Carolina, No. 5:14-ct-03220-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2015).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?