Anthony Hoover v. State of North Carolina

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03220-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999658178]. Mailed to: Anthony Leon Hoover and Terrence Leroy Wright El. [15-6492]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6492 Doc: 21 Filed: 09/11/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6492 ANTHONY LEON HOOVER, a/k/a Anthony Leon Hoover El; TERRENCE LEROY WRIGHT EL, as Moorish American Nationals, Plaintiffs - Appellants, and SAMUEL JUNIOR JACKSON; NAPOLEON J. RANKIN BEY; JAMES LEE TROXLER EL; ERRICK L. BOWE; WEBSTER WALLER, a/k/a Webster Waller Bey; MICHAEL HOLLIDAY; JAMES K. HOYLE BEY; MAURICE HARTGROVE, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Sub Jurisdiction Counties; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:14-ct-03220-F) Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. September 11, 2015 Appeal: 15-6492 Doc: 21 Filed: 09/11/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Anthony Leon Hoover; Terrence Leroy Wright, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-6492 Doc: 21 Filed: 09/11/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Anthony Leon Hoover and Terrence Leroy Wright El appeal the district court’s order dismissing U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). their complaint under 28 We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. North Carolina, No. 5:14-ct-03220-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2015). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?