Jabbar Straws v. SC Department of Correction
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-01802-BHH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999651566]. Mailed to: Jabbar Jomo Straws. [15-6501]
Appeal: 15-6501
Doc: 12
Filed: 09/01/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6501
JABBAR J. STRAWS, a/k/a Jabbar Jomo Straws,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WILLIAM R. BYARS,
JR.,
Director
of
the
South
Carolina
Department
of
Corrections, in his individual capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg.
Bruce H. Hendricks, District
Judge. (5:13-cv-01802-BHH)
Submitted:
August 27, 2015
Decided:
September 1, 2015
Before GREGORY and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jabbar Jomo
DAVIDSON &
Appellees.
Straws, Appellant Pro Se.
Daniel C. Plyler,
LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6501
Doc: 12
Filed: 09/01/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jabbar
J.
Straws
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting
summary judgment to defendants and dismissing without prejudice
this
action
filed
under
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2012).
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Straws
v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 5:13-cv-01802-BHH (D.S.C.
Mar. 31, 2015).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?