Jabbar Straws v. SC Department of Correction


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-01802-BHH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999651566]. Mailed to: Jabbar Jomo Straws. [15-6501]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6501 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/01/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6501 JABBAR J. STRAWS, a/k/a Jabbar Jomo Straws, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR., Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, in his individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (5:13-cv-01802-BHH) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015 Before GREGORY and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jabbar Jomo DAVIDSON & Appellees. Straws, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel C. Plyler, LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6501 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/01/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jabbar J. Straws appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting summary judgment to defendants and dismissing without prejudice this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Straws v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 5:13-cv-01802-BHH (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2015). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?