Michael Edward Kennedy v. US Parole Commission

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999615210-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999566242-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01435-CCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999627018]. Mailed to: Kennedy. [15-6535]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6535 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/24/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6535 MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (1:14-cv-01435-CCB) Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 24, 2015 Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Edward Kennedy, Appellant Pro Se. Neil R. White, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6535 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/24/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael Edward Kennedy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We reversible error. have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we deny Kennedy’s motion for appointment of counsel and his motion for release from supervision pending appeal, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kennedy v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, No. 1:14-cv-01435-CCB (D. Md. Feb. 13, 2015). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?