Michael Edward Kennedy v. US Parole Commission
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999615210-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999566242-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01435-CCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999627018]. Mailed to: Kennedy. [15-6535]
Appeal: 15-6535
Doc: 9
Filed: 07/24/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6535
MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge.
(1:14-cv-01435-CCB)
Submitted:
July 21, 2015
Decided:
July 24, 2015
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Edward Kennedy, Appellant Pro Se. Neil R. White, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6535
Doc: 9
Filed: 07/24/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael
Edward
Kennedy,
a
federal
prisoner,
appeals
the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012)
petition.
We
reversible error.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
Accordingly, we deny Kennedy’s motion for
appointment of counsel and his motion for release from supervision
pending appeal, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Kennedy v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, No. 1:14-cv-01435-CCB (D.
Md. Feb. 13, 2015).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?