US v. Edward Okun

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:08-cr-00132-REP-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999627039]. Mailed to: Edward Hugh Okun. [15-6548]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6548 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/24/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6548 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EDWARD HUGH OKUN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cr-00132-REP-1) Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 24, 2015 Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Hugh Okun, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Michael Steven Dry, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jessica D. Aber, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6548 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/24/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Edward Hugh Okun appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Okun, No. 3:08-cr-00132-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?