Broderick Patterson v. Gladhill, Jr.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-00026-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999658949]. Mailed to: B. Patterson. [15-6552]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6552 Doc: 15 Filed: 09/14/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6552 BRODERICK PATTERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GLADHILL, JR.; WAYNE WEBB; J. SNYDER, CO II; LT. BOWARD; TASKER, CO II; VINCENT, CO II; GROSSNICKLE, CO II; SGT. WYNKOOP; CAPTAIN MANUEL; CAPTAIN MARTIN; R. LEWIS, CO II; EMERICK, CO II; WILAND, CO II; MCGOWAN, CO II; PUMPHREY, CO II; SGT. DONIA; ATHERTON, CO II; GRUBBS, CO II; MASON, CO II, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN DOE, #1; JOHN DOE, #2, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:14-cv-00026-DKC) Submitted: August 31, 2015 Before WILKINSON and Senior Circuit Judge. KEENAN, Decided: Circuit September 14, 2015 Judges, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. and HAMILTON, Appeal: 15-6552 Doc: 15 Filed: 09/14/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Broderick Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith LaneWeber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-6552 Doc: 15 Filed: 09/14/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Broderick Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Gladhill, No. 8:14-cv-00026-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 13, 2015). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?