Almanzo R. Woodley v. Ken Stolle

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01722-CMH-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999643118]. Mailed to: Woodley. [15-6556]

Appeal: 15-6556

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/19/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6556

ALMANZO R. WOODLEY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
KEN STOLLE, Sheriff,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cv-01722-CMH-JFA)

Submitted:

August 17, 2015

Decided:

August 19, 2015

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Almanzo R. Woodley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6556

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/19/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Almanzo R. Woodley appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action for noncompliance
with a court order.

A plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court may warrant involuntary dismissal.
Civ. P. 41(b).

Fed. R.

We review a district court’s dismissal under

Rule 41(b) for abuse of discretion.
2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989).

Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.

We have reviewed the record and find

no abuse of discretion.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated

court.

by

the

district

See

Woodley

v.

1:14-cv-01722-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2015).

Stolle,

No.

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2