US v. Ernest Tucker
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:95-cr-00011-GMG-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999692732]. Mailed to: Ernest Tucker. [15-6579]
Appeal: 15-6579
Doc: 11
Filed: 11/04/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6579
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ERNEST MELVIN TUCKER, a/k/a Sonny Tucker,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:95-cr-00011-GMG-1)
Submitted:
October 30, 2015
Decided:
November 4, 2015
Before KING, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ernest Melvin Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6579
Doc: 11
Filed: 11/04/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Ernest
Melvin
Tucker
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
United States v. Tucker, No. 3:95-cr-00011-GMG-
1 (N.D. W. Va. Apr. 7, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?