US v. Curtis Tinsley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:06-cr-00009-JLK-2. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999646739]. Mailed to: Curtis Daryle Tinsley. [15-6598]

Appeal: 15-6598

Doc: 7

Filed: 08/25/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6598

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CURTIS DARYLE TINSLEY,
Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (4:06-cr-00009-JLK-2)

Submitted:

August 20, 2015

Decided:

August 25, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Daryle Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Jon Jacobsen, I,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Roanoke,
Virginia,
for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6598

Doc: 7

Filed: 08/25/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Curtis Daryle Tinsley appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for
sentence reduction.
reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

United States v. Tinsley, No. 4:06-cr-

00009-JLK-2 (W.D. Va. Mar. 23, 2015).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2