Terry Campbell v. Chuck Wright
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:14-cv-01832-BHH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999665305]. Mailed to: Terry Campbell. [15-6599]
Appeal: 15-6599
Doc: 13
Filed: 09/23/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6599
TERRY DOUGLAS CAMPBELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHUCK WRIGHT, Sheriff; NEIL URCH, Deputy; J. HUDSON, Deputy;
J. PARRIS, Deputy; NURSE JANE DOE; CHIEF PARRIS, a/k/a Moe
Poe; MICHAEL SEAN NIX, a/k/a Po Poe; DR. SAL BIANCO, a/k/a
John Doe,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
THE MUNICIPALITY OF SPARTANBURG COUNTY; D. GREENE; T. CAMP,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
Bruce H. Hendricks, District
Judge. (6:14-cv-01832-BHH)
Submitted:
August 31, 2015
Decided:
Before KING, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
September 23, 2015
Appeal: 15-6599
Doc: 13
Filed: 09/23/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Terry Douglas Campbell, Appellant Pro Se.
CLARKSON WALSH TERRELL & COULTER, PA,
Carolina, for Appellees.
Amy Miller Snyder,
Greenville, South
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-6599
Doc: 13
Filed: 09/23/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Terry Douglas Campbell appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2012)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
affirm
Campbell
2015).
legal
before
v.
for
the
reasons
Wright,
No.
stated
by
the
6:14-cv-01832-BHH
We
have
Accordingly,
district
(D.S.C.
court.
Mar.
25,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?