Terry Campbell v. Chuck Wright

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:14-cv-01832-BHH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999665305]. Mailed to: Terry Campbell. [15-6599]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6599 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/23/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6599 TERRY DOUGLAS CAMPBELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHUCK WRIGHT, Sheriff; NEIL URCH, Deputy; J. HUDSON, Deputy; J. PARRIS, Deputy; NURSE JANE DOE; CHIEF PARRIS, a/k/a Moe Poe; MICHAEL SEAN NIX, a/k/a Po Poe; DR. SAL BIANCO, a/k/a John Doe, Defendants – Appellees, and THE MUNICIPALITY OF SPARTANBURG COUNTY; D. GREENE; T. CAMP, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (6:14-cv-01832-BHH) Submitted: August 31, 2015 Decided: Before KING, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. September 23, 2015 Appeal: 15-6599 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/23/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Terry Douglas Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. CLARKSON WALSH TERRELL & COULTER, PA, Carolina, for Appellees. Amy Miller Snyder, Greenville, South Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-6599 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/23/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Terry Douglas Campbell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm Campbell 2015). legal before v. for the reasons Wright, No. stated by the 6:14-cv-01832-BHH We have Accordingly, district (D.S.C. court. Mar. 25, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?