Kirk Loney v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999626494-2], [999624789-2]. Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00845-REP. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999704427]. Mailed to: Kirk Loney. [15-6601]

Appeal: 15-6601

Doc: 15

Filed: 11/23/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6601

KIRK LEE LONEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; COFFEY, I.S.M.; MOORE, C.C.M.;
CROOMES, Mail Clerk; HARRELL WATTS; WADE MOORE; JOHN DOE;
JANE DOE; STEWART, Mail Clerk; A. W. ENGEL; TABOR, Unit
Manager; CUFFEE, Counselor; K. BLANKENSHIFT, Correctional
Officer;
LIEUTENANT
BROE;
MCDONALD,
Dentist;
ROACHE,
Dentist; MCDOUGAL, Dental Assistant; PATRICIA STANSBERRY,
Warden; BROWN, Case Manager,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
UNKNOWN
STAFF
FOR
F.C.C.
PETERSBURG
MEDIUM;
UNKNOWN
OFFICIALS FOR PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA U.S.P.S., sued in their
individual capacities,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:11-cv-00845-REP)

Submitted:

November 19, 2015

Decided:

November 23, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 15-6601

Doc: 15

Filed: 11/23/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

Kirk L. Loney, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United
States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-6601

Doc: 15

Filed: 11/23/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Kirk L. Loney appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28
U.S.C. §§ 2671–2680 (2012).
find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and

Accordingly, although we grant leave

to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.

Loney v. United States, No. 3:11–cv–

00845–REP (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 18, 2015; entered Feb. 19, 2015).
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3