US v. Celia Edward

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cr-00038-JPJ-PMS-3,1:12-cr-00030-JPJ-PMS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999611832]. Mailed to: Celia Edwards. [15-6623]

Appeal: 15-6623

Doc: 5

Filed: 06/30/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6623

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CELIA HAYNES EDWARDS, a/k/a Tina Hawks,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge.
(1:11-cr-00038-JPJ-PMS-3; 1:12-cr-00030-JPJ-PMS-1)

Submitted:

June 25, 2015

Decided:

June 30, 2015

Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Celia Haynes Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Roy Franklin Evans, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6623

Doc: 5

Filed: 06/30/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Celia

Haynes

Edwards

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying her motion for reconsideration of the court’s sentence
reduction

pursuant

to

18

U.S.C.

§

3582(c)(2)

Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines.

(2012),

and

to

We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Goodwyn,
596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that district court
does not have authority to reconsider prior order on § 3582
motion).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of

relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2