Christopher West v. William Byars, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00981-DCN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999722176]. Mailed to: Christopher West. [15-6628]
Appeal: 15-6628
Doc: 28
Filed: 12/21/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6628
CHRISTOPHER WEST,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR., in his individual and
official capacity as corrections employees of the State of
South Carolina, Kerhsaw State Prison; WARDEN CECILIA
REYNOLDS, in her individual and official capacity as
corrections employees of the State of South Carolina,
Kershaw State Prison; ASSOCIATE WARDEN JERRY WASHINGTON, in
his
individual
and
official
capacity
as
corrections
employees of the State of South Carolina, Kershaw State
Prison; MAJOR DARREN SEWARD, in his individual and official
capacity as corrections employees of the State of South
Carolina, Kershaw State Prison; CAPTAIN DANIEL DUBOSE, in
his
individual
and
official
capacity
as
corrections
employees of the State of South Carolina, Kerhsaw State
Prison; LIEUTENANT CLAUDE POWELL, in his individual and
official capacity as corrections employees of the State of
South Carolina, Kershaw State Prison; SERGEANT KRISTOPHER
SWEET,
in
his
individual
and
official
capacity
as
corrections employees of the State of South Carolina,
Kershaw State Prison; CORPORAL JEREMY TARLTON, in his
individual and official capacity as corrections employees
of the State of South Carolina, Kershaw State Prison;
OFFICER LAWRENCE TAYLOR, in his individual and official
capacity as corrections employees of the State of South
Carolina, Kershaw State Prison; NURSE LUANNE MUNGO, in her
individual and official capacity as corrections employees
of the State of South Carolina, Kershaw State Prison,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal: 15-6628
Doc: 28
Filed: 12/21/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(5:13-cv-00981-DCN)
Submitted:
December 17, 2015
Decided:
December 21, 2015
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher West, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-6628
Doc: 28
Filed: 12/21/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Christopher West appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
The district
court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012).
The magistrate judge recommended
that relief be denied and advised West that failure to file
timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate
review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have
been warned of the consequences of noncompliance.
Wright v.
Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see Massey v.
Ojaniit, 759 F.3d 343, 352 (4th Cir. 2014).
appellate
review
by
failing
receiving proper notice.
to
timely
file
West has waived
objections
after
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
the district court.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?