US v. Mark Gaddy

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:12-cr-00745-RBH-8 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999627317]. Mailed to: Mark Gaddy. [15-6659]

Appeal: 15-6659

Doc: 9

Filed: 07/24/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6659

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARK STEVEN GADDY,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:12-cr-00745-RBH-8)

Submitted:

July 21, 2015

Decided:

July 24, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Steven Gaddy, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6659

Doc: 9

Filed: 07/24/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Mark Steven Gaddy appeals the district court’s order denying
his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012) motion.
and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.

United States v. Gaddy, No.

4:12-cr-00745-RBH-8 (D.S.C. Apr. 17, 2015).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2