Joseph Ladeairous v. Michael Goldsmith

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00673-JAG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999629015]. Mailed to: Ladeairous. [15-6665]

Appeal: 15-6665

Doc: 10

Filed: 07/28/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6665

JOSEPH MICHAEL LADEAIROUS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL GOLDSMITH, Chief of Police, City of Norfolk, Virginia,
sued in official and individual; HAROLD CLARKE, Director of
the Virginia Department of Corrections, sued in official and
individual capacity; JAMES C. BODIE, Intake Counsel of the
Virginia State Bar, sued in official and individual capacity,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
VIRGINIA,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District
Judge. (3:13-cv-00673-JAG)

Submitted:

July 23, 2015

Decided:

July 28, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 15-6665

Doc: 10

Filed: 07/28/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

John Michael Ladeairous, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-6665

Doc: 10

Filed: 07/28/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Joseph Michael Ladeairous appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b) (2012).
and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.

Ladeairous v. Goldsmith,

No. 3:13-cv-00673-JAG (E.D. Va. Apr. 15, 2015).

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3