US v. Gerald Timmon

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999671571-2], denying Motion for other relief [999664808-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999585402-2] Originating case number: 4:08-cr-00373-RBH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999672100]. Mailed to: Gerald Timmons. [15-6668]

Appeal: 15-6668

Doc: 24

Filed: 10/05/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6668

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
GERALD ANDY TIMMONS, a/k/a G,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:08-cr-00373-RBH-1)

Submitted:

September 29, 2015

Decided:

October 5, 2015

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald Andy Timmons, Appellant Pro Se.
Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6668

Doc: 24

Filed: 10/05/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Gerald

Andy

Timmons

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction
of sentence.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

United States v. Timmons, No. 4:08-cr-00373-

RBH-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 17, 2015).

We deny the motions to modify the

transcript order and for summary remand.
proceed

in

forma

pauperis

and

dispense

We grant leave to
with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2