John Ervin Wilson, Jr. v. Shamika Broddy

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 9:14-cv-02531-BM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999693724]. Mailed to: Wilson. [15-6687]

Appeal: 15-6687

Doc: 16

Filed: 11/05/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6687

JOHN ERVIN WILSON, JR. a/k/a John Wilson, a/k/a John E.
Wilson,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
OFFICER SHAMIKA BRODDY,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Bristow Marchant, Magistrate
Judge. (9:14-cv-02531-BM)

Submitted:

October 28, 2015

Decided:

November 5, 2015

Before MOTZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Ervin Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. David Cornwell Holler, LEE
ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6687

Doc: 16

Filed: 11/05/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
John

Ervin

Wilson

appeals

the

magistrate

judge’s *

order

granting summary judgment to defendant and dismissing Wilson’s
complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012).
the record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.

Wilson v. Broddy,

No. 9:14-cv-02531-BM (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2015).

We dispense with

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).

2