US v. Dario Ruiz
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:11-cr-00077-RBH-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999651654]. Mailed to: Dario Ruiz. [15-6708]
Appeal: 15-6708
Doc: 8
Filed: 09/01/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6708
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DARIO RUIZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:11-cr-00077-RBH-1)
Submitted:
August 27, 2015
Decided:
September 1, 2015
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dario Ruiz, Appellant Pro Se.
Alfred William Walker Bethea,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6708
Doc: 8
Filed: 09/01/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Dario Ruiz appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(2012).
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
United States v. Ruiz, No. 4:11-cr-00077-RBH-1
(D.S.C. Apr. 23, 2015); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d
337,
340
(4th
Cir.
2011).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?