Jeffrey Pleasant v. Harold Clarke

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999598135-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00218-REP-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999682848]. Mailed to: Jeffrey Pleasant. [15-6731]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6731 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/21/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6731 JEFFREY A. PLEASANT, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Dept. of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-00218-REP-RCY) Submitted: September 29, 2015 Decided: October 21, 2015 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey A. Pleasant, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6731 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/21/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jeffery A. Pleasant appeals the district court’s order denying his pleading titled “Notice of Removal of a Civil Action Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b),” dismissing frivolous, and issuing a prefiling injunction. ∗ the record and find no reversible error. the action as We have reviewed As the plaintiff in the purported state court proceeding, Pleasant is not permitted to remove the action to federal court, so the dismissal was not error. Accordingly, though we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED ∗ Pleasant does not challenge in his informal brief the imposition of the prefiling injunction. Thus, that portion of the district court’s order is not before us. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?