Jason Gilmer v. Dr. Smith
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:14-cv-00111-NKM-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999646783]. Mailed to: Jason Nathaniel Gilmer. [15-6739]
Appeal: 15-6739
Doc: 19
Filed: 08/25/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6739
JASON NATHANIEL GILMER,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DR. SMITH, Head Physician of KMCC,
Defendant – Appellant,
and
MR. A. WHITED, R.N.C.B. of KMCC; L. FLEMING, Warden of KMCC,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Norman K. Moon, Senior
District Judge. (7:14-cv-00111-NKM-RSB)
Submitted:
August 20, 2015
Decided:
August 25, 2015
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mary Foil Russell, HALE, LYLE & RUSSELL, PC, Bristol, Tennessee,
for Appellant. Jason Nathaniel Gilmer, Appellee Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6739
Doc: 19
Filed: 08/25/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Dr. Happy Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying
his
motion
U.S.C.
§ 1983
for
(2012)
reconsideration
action.
in
This
Jason
court
Gilmer’s
may
42
exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012),
and
certain
interlocutory
and
collateral
orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
to
appeal
is
neither
a
final
interlocutory or collateral order.
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
order
The order Smith seeks
nor
an
appealable
Accordingly, we dismiss the
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?