Brent W. Cook v. Medical Dept.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999641813-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999619747-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00022-GBL-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999722172]. Mailed to: Brent Cook. [15-6756]

Appeal: 15-6756

Doc: 17

Filed: 12/21/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6756

BRENT W. COOK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MEDICAL DEPT., Staff; INTAKE, Booking Officers; SGT BERRY,
Sgt; SGT DURITY, Sgt,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Anthony John Trenga,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00022-GBL-JFA)

Submitted:

December 17, 2015

Decided:

December 21, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brent William Cook, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6756

Doc: 17

Filed: 12/21/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Brent
denying

his

proceeding.
error.

William

Cook

motion

to

appeals
reopen

the
his

district
42

order

§ 1983

U.S.C.

court’s

(2012)

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we deny Cook’s motions for leave to proceed

in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel, and we dismiss
the

appeal

for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

district

court.

Cook v. Med. Dep’t, No. 1:14-cv-00022-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. Apr. 21,
2015); see also 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (limiting our review to the
issues raised in Appellant’s informal brief).

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2