Henry Martin, Jr. v. Myecha Miley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:13-cv-03516-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999628950]. Mailed to: Henry W. Martin Jr. KIRKLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 4344 Broad River Road Columbia, SC 29210-0000. [15-6769]

Appeal: 15-6769

Doc: 9

Filed: 07/28/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6769

HENRY W. MARTIN, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CPT MYECHA MILEY,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
WILLIAM R. BYARS; JOHN R. PATE; ARTHUR A. JORDAN; MCKENNDLY
NEWTON; ROBERT E. WARD; JON OZMINT; DENNIS PATTERSON; DANIEL
MURPHY; DAVID M. TATARSKY; LT J. CARUJO; LT J. CARTER; ROBERT
ORR; LT JAMES RUMP; CAPTAIN E. J. MILLER; DR. THOMAS BYNSE; LT
VARLEASE BLACK; CPL L. JENKINS; M. HUDSON; S. SINGLATON, DHO;
CPL T. SIMPSON; MR. MCQUEEN; P. SMITH; A. HOLLMAN; HELEN
FREEMAN; THOMAS SCOTT; CPT E. JAMES; TANYA A. GEE; V. CLAIRE
ALLEN; JOHN C. FEW; WAYNE C. MCCABE; JILL BEATTIE; JEANNETTE
MACK; FRANCINE BAUCHMAN; PATTY BRITT POSEY; JAMES S. SLIGH, JR.;
DR. ROWLAND; GREGORY S. LINE; CHARLOTTE SMITH; ELLEN GOODWIN;
RUSSELL RUSH; JIM CROSBY; SUSAN BARDEN; VIRGINIA CROCKER; PAM
SMITH; LAKETA DIKA; DEBORAH B. DURDEN,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(6:13-cv-03516-TMC)

Submitted:

July 23, 2015

Decided:

July 28, 2015

Appeal: 15-6769

Doc: 9

Filed: 07/28/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry W. Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael D. Freeman, Sr.,
GRIFFITH, SHARP & LIIPFERT, LLC, Beaufort, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-6769

Doc: 9

Filed: 07/28/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Henry W. Martin, Jr. appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.

The

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant
to

28

U.S.C.

§

636(b)(1)(B)

(2012).

The

magistrate

judge

recommended that relief be denied and advised Martin that failure
to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive
appellate

review

of

a

district

court

order

based

upon

the

recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been
warned of the consequences of noncompliance.

Wright v. Collins,

766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474
U.S. 140 (1985).

Martin has waived appellate review by failing to

file

objections

specific

after

receiving

proper

notice.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3