US v. Michael William

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:95-cr-00009-H-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999628940]. Mailed to: M. Williams. [15-6780]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6780 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/28/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6780 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL CRANDALE WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (2:95-cr-00009-H-1) Submitted: July 10, 2015 Decided: July 28, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Crandale Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6780 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/28/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael order Crandale denying his Williams motion for appeals a the sentence district reduction court’s under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, no reversible error. reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for See United States v. Williams, No. 2:95-cr-00009-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 2015). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?