US v. Robert Milligan
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:12-cr-00669-RBH-6 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999670311]. Mailed to: Robert Dewayne Milligan. [15-6786]
Appeal: 15-6786
Doc: 7
Filed: 10/01/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6786
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ROBERT DEWAYNE MILLIGAN, a/k/a Wayne,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:12-cr-00669-RBH-6)
Submitted:
September 16, 2015
Decided:
October 1, 2015
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Dewayne Milligan, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley
Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina; Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorney,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6786
Doc: 7
Filed: 10/01/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Dewayne Milligan appeals the district court’s order
denying
Milligan’s
18
reduction of sentence.
U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2)
(2012)
motion
for
We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by
court.
the
district
United
States
4:12-cr-00669-RHB-6 (D.S.C. May 8, 2015).
v.
Milligan,
No.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?