US v. Gonzales March

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to supplement [999610347-2] Originating case number: 3:08-cr-00590-CMC-6,3:12-cv-01977-CMC,3:10-cv-70294-CMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999658947]. Mailed to: Gonzales March. [15-6792]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6792 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/14/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6792 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. GONZALES MARCH, a/k/a Gun, a/k/a Gon, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cr-00590-CMC-6; 3:12-cv-01977-CMC; 3:10-cv-70924-CMC) Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gonzales March, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Julius Ness Richardson, John David Rowell, Assistant United States Attorneys, James Chris Leventis, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6792 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/14/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Gonzales March appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, after construing it as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. March, Nos. 3:08-cr-00590-CMC-6; 3:12-cv-01977-CMC; 3:10-cv-70294-CMC (D.S.C. May 7, 2015). We deny March’s motion to supplement a request for a certificate of appealability as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?