US v. Herman Wingo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:09-cr-00854-RBH-5 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999659113]. Mailed to: Herman Wingo. [15-6801]

Appeal: 15-6801

Doc: 8

Filed: 09/14/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6801

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HERMAN ROBINSON WINGO,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:09-cr-00854-RBH-5)

Submitted:

September 9, 2015

Decided:

September 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herman Robinson Wingo, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Frank Daley,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina;
Carrie
Fisher
Sherard,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6801

Doc: 8

Filed: 09/14/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Herman Robinson Wingo appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction

based

on

Guidelines Manual.
reversible error.

Amendment

to

the

U.S.

Sentencing

We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.
00854–RBH-5

782

(D.S.C.

See United States v. Wingo, No. 4:09–cr–

Apr.

27,

2015).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2