Brian Keith Nesbitt v. Tim Riley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999606806-2]; denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999628278-2]; denying Motion for a temporary restraining order [999623845-2] Originating case number: 0:14-cv-02788-RMG-PJG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999680463]. Mailed to: Nesbitt. [15-6835]

Appeal: 15-6835

Doc: 18

Filed: 10/19/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6835

BRIAN KEITH NESBITT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TIM RILEY, Warden; BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director of the
Department of Corrections; AMY SPENCER; DR. J. R. BEARDEN;
DHO RICHARD TURNER; LAURA CALDWELL; LT. LAWSON, Safety;
ADMIN CAPTAIN NANCE; GARY LANE; INVESTIGATOR LANE; KAREN
MCMORRIS; CAP. JENNETTE GLEN; LT. JASON WEBBER; MAJOR JAMES
PARRIS; CAPTAIN CATHY DUNCAN; DR. T. BYRNE,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (0:14-cv-02788-RMG-PJG)

Submitted:

October 15, 2015

Decided:

October 19, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian Keith Nesbitt, Appellant Pro Se.
Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.

James E. Parham, Jr.,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6835

Doc: 18

Filed: 10/19/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Brian

Keith

Nesbitt

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
Nesbitt’s motions for a preliminary injunction and a temporary
restraining order in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Nesbitt

v.

Riley,

No.

0:14-cv-02788-RMG-PJG

filed May 1, 2015 & entered May 4, 2015).

(D.S.C.

We deny Nesbitt’s

motions for appointment of counsel, a preliminary injunction,
and

a

temporary

restraining

order.

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2