Victor Buencamino v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999601230-2] Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03307-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999675389]. Mailed to: V. Buencamino. [15-6840]
Appeal: 15-6840
Doc: 12
Filed: 10/09/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6840
VICTOR J. BUENCAMINO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; CHARLES
SAMUELS; NEWTON E. KENDIG; H. WILLIAMS; KENNY ATKINSON;
ASSOCIATE WARDEN
COLE; ASSOCIATE WARDEN
BOLSTER; ASHLEY
MURRAY; ROBERT E. COCHRANE; BRYON HERBEL; MAUREEN REARDON;
NURSE WILSON; LT.
STONE; LT.
EATON; LT.
PARENT; C.O.
JOHNSON; C.O. CHAPMAN; C.O. JACKET; C.O. BEARD; C.O.
BOLTON; C.O. RICHARDSON; EDWARD LANDIS,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03307-BO)
Submitted:
September 29, 2015
Decided:
October 9, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor J. Buencamino, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6840
Doc: 12
Filed: 10/09/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Victor
J.
appeals
as
dismissing
Buencamino
frivolous
his
the
district
complaint
court’s
filed
order
pursuant
to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.
§§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (2012), and denying his various motions.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief.
does
not
in
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
his
informal
brief
Because Buencamino
challenge
the
basis
for
the
district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review
of the court’s order.
Further, we decline to consider the issue
Buencamino does raise on appeal, as he did not properly raise
that
issue
before
the
district
court.
States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).
leave
to
proceed
in
court’s judgment.
facts
and
materials
legal
before
forma
pauperis
See
Muth
v.
United
Accordingly, we grant
and
affirm
the
district
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?