Victor Buencamino v. US


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999601230-2] Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03307-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999675389]. Mailed to: V. Buencamino. [15-6840]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6840 Doc: 12 Filed: 10/09/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6840 VICTOR J. BUENCAMINO, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; CHARLES SAMUELS; NEWTON E. KENDIG; H. WILLIAMS; KENNY ATKINSON; ASSOCIATE WARDEN COLE; ASSOCIATE WARDEN BOLSTER; ASHLEY MURRAY; ROBERT E. COCHRANE; BRYON HERBEL; MAUREEN REARDON; NURSE WILSON; LT. STONE; LT. EATON; LT. PARENT; C.O. JOHNSON; C.O. CHAPMAN; C.O. JACKET; C.O. BEARD; C.O. BOLTON; C.O. RICHARDSON; EDWARD LANDIS, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:14-ct-03307-BO) Submitted: September 29, 2015 Decided: October 9, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor J. Buencamino, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6840 Doc: 12 Filed: 10/09/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Victor J. appeals as dismissing Buencamino frivolous his the district complaint court’s filed order pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (2012), and denying his various motions. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. does not in See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). his informal brief Because Buencamino challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Further, we decline to consider the issue Buencamino does raise on appeal, as he did not properly raise that issue before the district court. States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). leave to proceed in court’s judgment. facts and materials legal before forma pauperis See Muth v. United Accordingly, we grant and affirm the district We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?