Victor Buencamino v. US
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999601230-2] Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03307-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: V. Buencamino. [15-6840]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
VICTOR J. BUENCAMINO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; CHARLES
SAMUELS; NEWTON E. KENDIG; H. WILLIAMS; KENNY ATKINSON;
COLE; ASSOCIATE WARDEN
MURRAY; ROBERT E. COCHRANE; BRYON HERBEL; MAUREEN REARDON;
NURSE WILSON; LT.
JOHNSON; C.O. CHAPMAN; C.O. JACKET; C.O. BEARD; C.O.
BOLTON; C.O. RICHARDSON; EDWARD LANDIS,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03307-BO)
September 29, 2015
October 9, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor J. Buencamino, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.
§§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (2012), and denying his various motions.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review
of the court’s order.
Further, we decline to consider the issue
Buencamino does raise on appeal, as he did not properly raise
States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly, we grant
We dispense with oral argument because the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?