US v. Robert Ro

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [999611264-2] Originating case number: 1:07-cr-00117-MR-1,1:09-cv-00365-MR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999683906]. Mailed to: Robert Keith Ross. [15-6846]

Appeal: 15-6846

Doc: 11

Filed: 10/22/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6846

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ROBERT KEITH ROSS,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:07-cr-00117-MR-1; 1:09-cv-00365-MR)

Submitted:

October 20, 2015

Decided:

October 22, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Keith Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6846

Doc: 11

Filed: 10/22/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Robert

Keith

Ross

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it as such.

We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
States

v.

(W.D.N.C.

Ross,
May

11,

Nos.

1:07-cr-00117-MR-1;

2015).

certificate of appealability.

We

deny

Ross’s

United

1:09-cv-00365-MR
motion

for

a

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2