Eddie Gamble, Sr. v. Dr. Onoha

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint counsel [999607947-2]. Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03242-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999681805]. Mailed to: Eddie Gamble, Sr. [15-6876]

Appeal: 15-6876

Doc: 13

Filed: 10/20/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6876

EDDIE GAMBLE, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. ONOHA; UNKNOWN DEFENDANT,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03242-FL)

Submitted:

October 15, 2015

Decided:

October 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Gamble, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6876

Doc: 13

Filed: 10/20/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Eddie Gamble, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s
order

dismissing

without

prejudice

under

28

U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) his action filed pursuant to Bivens v.
Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971).
raised

in

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues
the

Appellant’s

brief.

See

4th

Cir.

R.

34(b).

Because Gamble’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Gamble has forfeited appellate
review

of

the

court’s

order.

Accordingly,

we

deny

Gamble’s

motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal.
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2