Peter Bakowski v. Kenny Atkinson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint counsel [999627510-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999611196-2] Originating case number: 5:14-hc-02078-D. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999712313]. Mailed to: Peter Bakowski. [15-6883]
Appeal: 15-6883
Doc: 13
Filed: 12/04/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6883
PETER ANTHONY BAKOWSKI,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
KENNY ATKINSON, Warden, Federal Medical Center at Butner,
NC,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever III,
Chief District Judge. (5:14-hc-02078-D)
Submitted:
November 6, 2015
Before NIEMEYER
Circuit Judge.
and
DIAZ,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
December 4, 2015
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter Anthony Bakowski, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6883
Doc: 13
Filed: 12/04/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Peter
district
Anthony
court’s
Bakowski,
order
a
federal
dismissing
prisoner,
without
appeals
prejudice
his
the
28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, and its subsequent order denying
his motions for reconsideration.
On appeal, he pursues only the
claim that his restitution amount was improperly calculated.
have
reviewed
the
record
Accordingly,
although
pauperis,
affirm
court.
we
Bakowski
Dec. 2, 2014).
counsel.
legal
before
we
for
v.
and
find
the
reversible
leave
grant
no
to
proceed
reasons
Atkinson,
No.
stated
by
5:14-hc-02078-D
error.
in
the
We
forma
district
(E.D.N.C.
We deny Bakowski’s motion for appointment of
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?