Peter Bakowski v. Kenny Atkinson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint counsel [999627510-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999611196-2] Originating case number: 5:14-hc-02078-D. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999712313]. Mailed to: Peter Bakowski. [15-6883]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6883 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/04/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6883 PETER ANTHONY BAKOWSKI, Petitioner – Appellant, v. KENNY ATKINSON, Warden, Federal Medical Center at Butner, NC, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:14-hc-02078-D) Submitted: November 6, 2015 Before NIEMEYER Circuit Judge. and DIAZ, Decided: Circuit Judges, December 4, 2015 and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter Anthony Bakowski, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6883 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/04/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Peter district Anthony court’s Bakowski, order a federal dismissing prisoner, without appeals prejudice his the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, and its subsequent order denying his motions for reconsideration. On appeal, he pursues only the claim that his restitution amount was improperly calculated. have reviewed the record Accordingly, although pauperis, affirm court. we Bakowski Dec. 2, 2014). counsel. legal before we for v. and find the reversible leave grant no to proceed reasons Atkinson, No. stated by 5:14-hc-02078-D error. in the We forma district (E.D.N.C. We deny Bakowski’s motion for appointment of We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?