James Johnson v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00076-MFU-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999685052]. Mailed to: J. Johnson. [15-6886, 15-6887]
Appeal: 15-6886
Doc: 13
Filed: 10/23/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6886
JAMES BOWERS JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; DEPARTMENT
OF THE TREASURY; DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE;
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 15-6887
JAMES BOWERS JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; DEPARTMENT
OF THE TREASURY; DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
Judge. (7:15-cv-00076-MFU-RSB; 7:15-cv-00067-MFU-RSB)
Submitted:
October 20, 2015
Decided:
October 23, 2015
Appeal: 15-6886
Doc: 13
Filed: 10/23/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Bowers Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-6886
Doc: 13
Filed: 10/23/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
In
these
consolidated
cases,
James
Bowers
Johnson,
a
federal inmate, appeals the district court’s orders dismissing
as frivolous Johnson’s consolidated civil complaints and denying
Johnson’s motion for reconsideration of that order.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we affirm the district court’s orders.
We have
Accordingly,
See Johnson v. United
States, Nos. 7:15-cv-00076-MFU-RSB; 7:15-cv-00067-MFU-RSB (W.D.
Va.
May
11,
2015
&
May
28,
2015).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?