James Johnson v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00076-MFU-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999685052]. Mailed to: J. Johnson. [15-6886, 15-6887]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6886 Doc: 13 Filed: 10/23/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6886 JAMES BOWERS JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendants - Appellees. No. 15-6887 JAMES BOWERS JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (7:15-cv-00076-MFU-RSB; 7:15-cv-00067-MFU-RSB) Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015 Appeal: 15-6886 Doc: 13 Filed: 10/23/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Bowers Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-6886 Doc: 13 Filed: 10/23/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, James Bowers Johnson, a federal inmate, appeals the district court’s orders dismissing as frivolous Johnson’s consolidated civil complaints and denying Johnson’s motion for reconsideration of that order. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm the district court’s orders. We have Accordingly, See Johnson v. United States, Nos. 7:15-cv-00076-MFU-RSB; 7:15-cv-00067-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. May 11, 2015 & May 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?