James Henson, Jr. v. Bradley Wilt
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-03724-RDB,1:14-cv-03825-RDB,1:15-cv-00028-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999691403]. Mailed to: Henson. [15-6896]
Appeal: 15-6896
Doc: 12
Filed: 11/03/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6896
JAMES A. HENSON, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BRADLEY A. WILT; WALTER ISER; BRIAN IAMES; T. L. SIRES;
WILLIAM E. MILLER; ROBERT M. FRIEND; DALE SMITH; SGT.
PUFFENBERG; NICOLAS SOLTAS; STEVEN J. MILLER; SHAWN MURRAY;
JESSE L. LAMBERT; P. DEIST; C.O. II ANDERSON; B.E. FANN;
C.O. II SAVILLE; C.O. II GILPEN; JOHN SINDY; MR. HERBOLD;
MR. LITTIER; MRS. HOLWAGER; C.O. II WALTERS; M. SMITH; NP
JANETTE CLARK; RODNEY O. LIKIN; GUARDS JON DOE; RICHARD
MILLER;
RICHARD
S.
RODERICK;
WILLIAM
S.
BOHRER;
SUBORDINATES IN HV #1@ NBCI, (HV #4@WCI); ROBERT M. FRIEND;
FRANK B. BISHOP. JR.; J. PHILIP MORGAN, SR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-03724-RDB; 1:14-cv-03825-RDB; 1:15-cv-00028-RDB)
Submitted:
October 28, 2015
Decided:
November 3, 2015
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A. Henson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6896
Doc: 12
Filed: 11/03/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
James A. Henson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing
his
consolidated
without prejudice.
reversible error.
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2012)
actions
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Henson v. Wilt, Nos. 1:14-cv-03724-RDB;
1:14-cv-03825-RDB; 1:15-cv-00028-RDB (D. Md. Jan. 4, 2015).
We
deny Henson’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?