James Henson, Jr. v. Bradley Wilt

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-03724-RDB,1:14-cv-03825-RDB,1:15-cv-00028-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999691403]. Mailed to: Henson. [15-6896]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6896 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/03/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6896 JAMES A. HENSON, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BRADLEY A. WILT; WALTER ISER; BRIAN IAMES; T. L. SIRES; WILLIAM E. MILLER; ROBERT M. FRIEND; DALE SMITH; SGT. PUFFENBERG; NICOLAS SOLTAS; STEVEN J. MILLER; SHAWN MURRAY; JESSE L. LAMBERT; P. DEIST; C.O. II ANDERSON; B.E. FANN; C.O. II SAVILLE; C.O. II GILPEN; JOHN SINDY; MR. HERBOLD; MR. LITTIER; MRS. HOLWAGER; C.O. II WALTERS; M. SMITH; NP JANETTE CLARK; RODNEY O. LIKIN; GUARDS JON DOE; RICHARD MILLER; RICHARD S. RODERICK; WILLIAM S. BOHRER; SUBORDINATES IN HV #1@ NBCI, (HV #4@WCI); ROBERT M. FRIEND; FRANK B. BISHOP. JR.; J. PHILIP MORGAN, SR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:14-cv-03724-RDB; 1:14-cv-03825-RDB; 1:15-cv-00028-RDB) Submitted: October 28, 2015 Decided: November 3, 2015 Before WILKINSON, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James A. Henson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6896 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/03/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: James A. Henson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his consolidated without prejudice. reversible error. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) actions We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henson v. Wilt, Nos. 1:14-cv-03724-RDB; 1:14-cv-03825-RDB; 1:15-cv-00028-RDB (D. Md. Jan. 4, 2015). We deny Henson’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?