Billy Parker v. Rick Burri

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00488-LCB-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999704681]. Mailed to: Billy Ray Parker 238 Lakeshore Drive Norwood, NC 28128. [15-6900]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6900 Doc: 29 Filed: 11/23/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6900 BILLY RAY PARKER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. RICK BURRIS, Sheriff of Stanly County, North Carolina; CAPT. LANE BURRIS; DEPUTY DARRIN POPLIN; LT. TOMMY HUDSON; SARAH MILLS, LPN, Defendants – Appellees, and SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC., Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta Copeland Biggs, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00488-LCB-LPA) Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 23, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Billy Ray Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Houghton Flanagan, Virginia Marie Wooten, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Walter Gregory Merritt, Jay C. Appeal: 15-6900 Doc: 29 Filed: 11/23/2015 Salsman, HARRIS, CREECH, Carolina, for Appellees. Pg: 2 of 3 WARD & BLACKERBY, New Bern, North Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-6900 Doc: 29 Filed: 11/23/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Billy Ray Parker appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm Parker v. 2015). legal before for the Burris, reasons No. stated by the 1:13-cv-00488-LCB-LPA We have Accordingly, district (M.D.N.C. court. May 8, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?