Billy Parker v. Rick Burri
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00488-LCB-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999704681]. Mailed to: Billy Ray Parker 238 Lakeshore Drive Norwood, NC 28128. [15-6900]
Appeal: 15-6900
Doc: 29
Filed: 11/23/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6900
BILLY RAY PARKER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
RICK BURRIS, Sheriff of Stanly County, North Carolina;
CAPT. LANE BURRIS; DEPUTY DARRIN POPLIN; LT. TOMMY HUDSON;
SARAH MILLS, LPN,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
Loretta Copeland
Biggs, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00488-LCB-LPA)
Submitted:
November 19, 2015
Decided:
November 23, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Billy Ray Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Houghton Flanagan,
Virginia Marie Wooten, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP,
Charlotte, North Carolina; Walter Gregory Merritt, Jay C.
Appeal: 15-6900
Doc: 29
Filed: 11/23/2015
Salsman, HARRIS, CREECH,
Carolina, for Appellees.
Pg: 2 of 3
WARD
&
BLACKERBY,
New
Bern,
North
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-6900
Doc: 29
Filed: 11/23/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Billy
Ray
Parker
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2012)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
affirm
Parker v.
2015).
legal
before
for
the
Burris,
reasons
No.
stated
by
the
1:13-cv-00488-LCB-LPA
We
have
Accordingly,
district
(M.D.N.C.
court.
May
8,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?