Myron Nunn v. N.C. Legislation
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03190-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999681616]. Mailed to: Nunn. [15-6902]
Appeal: 15-6902
Doc: 15
Filed: 10/20/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6902
MYRON RODERICK NUNN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
N.C. LEGISLATION; FRANK L. PERRY; GEORGE T. SOLOMON; FINESSE
COUCH; TODD PINION; ROBERT JONES; BELINDA DUDLEY; RICHARD
NEELY; DEAN LOCKLEAR; TIM CURLY; ROBERT WILLIAMS; JAMES
HOLMES; ANGIE BENGE; JEFF WILKERSON; MRS. CAMERON; MR.
SANDERS; MR. MCCLAIN; DR. MILTON D. WESTBERG; NURSE NELSON;
DR. LANCE; NC DPS UTILIZATION REVIEW BOARD; MR. PRICE; MS.
CLARK; COL RESPASS; RICKY MATTHEWS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03190-FL)
Submitted:
October 15, 2015
Decided:
October 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Myron Roderick Nunn, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6902
Doc: 15
Filed: 10/20/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Myron
Roderick
Nunn
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2012)
and
have
denying
the
motion
record
and
find
for
reconsideration.
We
reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
reviewed
his
no
Nunn v. N.C. Legislation, No. 5:14-ct-
03190-FL (E.D.N.C. April 15, 2015; June 8, 2015).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?