Joseph Ruhren v. Marcos Spittal

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00445-AJT-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999684682]. Mailed to: Joseph Ruhren. [15-6905]

Appeal: 15-6905

Doc: 14

Filed: 10/23/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6905

JOSEPH RUHREN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MARCOS SPITTAL, Detective Prince William County Police;
LUTHER, Sergeant Manassas A.D.C.; MELETIS, Superintendent
Manassas A.D.C.,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Anthony John Trenga,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00445-AJT-JFA)

Submitted:

October 20, 2015

Decided:

October 23, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Ruhren, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6905

Doc: 14

Filed: 10/23/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Joseph Ruhren appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
(2012).
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

Ruhren v. Spittal, No. 1:15-cv-00445-AJT-JFA

(E.D. Va. May 14, 2015).

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2