Joey Scott v. Reuben Young
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:12-ct-03159-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999697545]. Mailed to: Joey Scott. [15-6908]
Appeal: 15-6908
Doc: 14
Filed: 11/12/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6908
JOEY DUANE SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
REUBEN FRANKLIN YOUNG; ROBERT C.
HATTIE PIMPONG; JAMES M. JOHNSON,
LEWIS;
FRANK
L.
PERRY;
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:12-ct-03159-FL)
Submitted:
October 30, 2015
Decided:
November 12, 2015
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joey Duane Scott, Appellant Pro Se.
Yvonne Bulluck Ricci,
Assistant Attorney General, Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6908
Doc: 14
Filed: 11/12/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Joey Duane Scott appeals the district court’s order denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
nondispositive orders.
reversible error.
§ 1983
(2012)
complaint
and
certain
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Scott v. Young, No. 5:12-ct-03159-FL
(E.D.N.C. June 19, 2014; Oct. 7, 2014, Jan. 22, 2015; Apr. 15,
2015; May 28, 2015).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?