Joey Scott v. Reuben Young

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:12-ct-03159-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999697545]. Mailed to: Joey Scott. [15-6908]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6908 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/12/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6908 JOEY DUANE SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REUBEN FRANKLIN YOUNG; ROBERT C. HATTIE PIMPONG; JAMES M. JOHNSON, LEWIS; FRANK L. PERRY; Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:12-ct-03159-FL) Submitted: October 30, 2015 Decided: November 12, 2015 Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joey Duane Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6908 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/12/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Joey Duane Scott appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. nondispositive orders. reversible error. § 1983 (2012) complaint and certain We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Young, No. 5:12-ct-03159-FL (E.D.N.C. June 19, 2014; Oct. 7, 2014, Jan. 22, 2015; Apr. 15, 2015; May 28, 2015). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?