Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr. v. Judge Hending

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999668253-2], denying Motion for other relief [999656698-2], denying Motion for other relief [999614053-2] Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03081-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999717501]. Mailed to: Doyle. [15-6923]

Appeal: 15-6923

Doc: 31

Filed: 12/14/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6923

BENJAMIN L. DOYLE, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JUDGE HENDING; HALIFAX COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE;
HALIFAX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:15-ct-03081-FL)

Submitted:

December 3, 2015

Decided:

December 14, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6923

Doc: 31

Filed: 12/14/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing
complaint

without
pursuant

prejudice
to

28

his

U.S.C.

42

U.S.C.

§ 1915(g)

§ 1983

(2012).

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we

affirm

for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

(2012)
We

have

Accordingly,

district

court.

Doyle v. Hending, No. 5:15-ct-03081-FL (E.D.N.C. May 10, 2015).
We

deny

Doyle’s

motion

to

be

heard

and

his

complete and full discovery of all evidence.
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

motions

for

a

We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2