US v. Cinton Shawn Martin, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed under CJA [999613170-2] Originating case number: 5:09-cr-00043-SGW-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999659054]. Mailed to: Martin. [15-6929]

Appeal: 15-6929

Doc: 8

Filed: 09/14/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6929

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee,
v.
CLINTON SHAWN MARTIN, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.
Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:09-cr-00043-SGW-1)

Submitted:

September 9, 2015

Decided:

September 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clinton Shawn Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Grayson A.
Hoffman, Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6929

Doc: 8

Filed: 09/14/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Clinton

Shawn

Martin,

Jr.,

appeals

the

district

court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence
reduction pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

See United States v. Martin, No. 5:09-cr-00043-SGW-1

(E.D. Va. filed May 28, 2015, entered May 29, 2015).
leave

to

proceed

in

forma

pauperis.

We

dispense

We grant
with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2