Wilmer Knight v. Officer Sheppherd

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint counsel [999618619-2]; denying Motion vacate decision on appeal [999608688-2]; denying Motion for judgment [999605822-2], denying Motion for reconsideration [999605037-2] Originating case number: 7:14-cv-00687-GEC-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court. [999730689]. Mailed to: Wilmer Knight. [15-6951]

Appeal: 15-6951

Doc: 30

Filed: 01/06/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6951

WILMER JEROME KNIGHT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
OFFICER SHEPPHERD; OFFICER PARKS,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:14-cv-00687-GEC-RSB)

Submitted:

November 13, 2015

Decided:

January 6, 2016

Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilmer Jerome Knight, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6951

Doc: 30

Filed: 01/06/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Wilmer

Jerome

Knight

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Knight v. Sheppherd, No. 7:14-cv-00687-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va.

May 22, 2015).
vacate,
dispense

for

We deny Knight’s motions for reconsideration, to
judgment

with

contentions

are

oral

and

for

argument

adequately

appointment
because

presented

in

the
the

of

counsel,

facts

and

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2