Ronald Cosner v. B. Dodt
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999688665-2] Originating case number: 1:12-cv-01366-LMB-TRJ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999774456]. Mailed to: Ronald Cosner. [15-6962]
Appeal: 15-6962
Doc: 33
Filed: 03/15/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6962
RONALD L. COSNER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
B. DODT, Nurse Practitioner at Powhatan Medical Unit;
RONALD TONEY, Doctor and Medical Director in the P.M.U.,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Corp.
contract with V.D.O.C. to provide health services,
under
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:12-cv-01366-LMB-TRJ)
Submitted:
March 10, 2016
Decided:
March 15, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald L. Cosner, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac Abraham McBeth,
Edward J. McNelis, III, Rachel Lynne Procopio, RAWLS, MCNELIS &
MITCHELL, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Appeal: 15-6962
Doc: 33
Filed: 03/15/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-6962
Doc: 33
Filed: 03/15/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Ronald L. Cosner appeals the district court’s order denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2012)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
have
Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
No.
1:12-cv-01366-LMB-TRJ
June 17,
facts
2015).
and
materials
legal
before
We
(E.D.
dispense
Va.
with
Mar.
oral
14
&
Aug.
argument
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
Cosner v. Dodt,
1,
because
presented
would
2014;
not
the
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?