US v. Kelly Stanback

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:02-cr-30020-SGW-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999658940]. Mailed to: Appellant. [15-6969]

Appeal: 15-6969

Doc: 8

Filed: 09/14/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6969

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
KELLY GEORGE STANBACK,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.
Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:02-cr-30020-SGW-1)

Submitted:

September 9, 2015

Decided:

September 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelly George Stanback, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Jeb
Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Elizabeth G.
Wright, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Harrisonburg,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6969

Doc: 8

Filed: 09/14/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Kelly George Stanback appeals the district court’s order
granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. *
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

United

States v. Stanback, No. 5:02-cr-30020-SGW-1 (W.D. Va. filed June
8 and entered June 9, 2015).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Although the district court granted Stanback’s
motion, the reduction granted by the court did not
Stanback’s sentence to the full extent he requested.

2

§ 3582
reduce