Connell Hawkins v. Officer Kinlaw

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999628328-2] Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03241-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999684662]. Mailed to: Connell Hawkins. [15-6976]

Appeal: 15-6976

Doc: 18

Filed: 10/23/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6976

CONNELL D. HAWKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER
KINLAW; OFFICER STRICKLAND;
OFFICER BULLARD; OFFICER J. PRINCE,

OFFICER

RUSSELL;

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03241-F)

Submitted:

October 20, 2015

Decided:

October 23, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Connell D. Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6976

Doc: 18

Filed: 10/23/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Connell

D.

Hawkins

appeals
his

district

42

U.S.C.

court’s
§ 1983

order

dismissing

without

complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.

prejudice

the

(2012)

Accordingly, we deny Hawkins’ motion for appointment of

counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Hawkins v. Kinlaw, No. 5:14-ct-03241-F (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2015)
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2