Connell Hawkins v. Officer Kinlaw


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999628328-2] Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03241-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999684662]. Mailed to: Connell Hawkins. [15-6976]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6976 Doc: 18 Filed: 10/23/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6976 CONNELL D. HAWKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER KINLAW; OFFICER STRICKLAND; OFFICER BULLARD; OFFICER J. PRINCE, OFFICER RUSSELL; Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:14-ct-03241-F) Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Connell D. Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6976 Doc: 18 Filed: 10/23/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Connell D. Hawkins appeals his district 42 U.S.C. court’s § 1983 order dismissing without complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. prejudice the (2012) Accordingly, we deny Hawkins’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hawkins v. Kinlaw, No. 5:14-ct-03241-F (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2015) We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?