US v. Timothy Craig

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:02-cr-01358-HMH-8. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999685072]. Mailed to: T. Craig. [15-6978]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6978 Doc: 5 Filed: 10/23/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6978 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. TIMOTHY G. CRAIG, a/k/a Boot, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:02-cr-01358-HMH-8) Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy G. Craig, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6978 Doc: 5 Filed: 10/23/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Timothy G. Craig appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. reduction. error. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Craig, No. 6:02-cr-01358-HMH-8 (D.S.C. Apr. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?