US v. Timothy Craig
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:02-cr-01358-HMH-8. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999685072]. Mailed to: T. Craig. [15-6978]
Appeal: 15-6978
Doc: 5
Filed: 10/23/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6978
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
TIMOTHY G. CRAIG, a/k/a Boot,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:02-cr-01358-HMH-8)
Submitted:
October 20, 2015
Decided:
October 23, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy G. Craig, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6978
Doc: 5
Filed: 10/23/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy G. Craig appeals the district court’s order denying
his
18
U.S.C.
reduction.
error.
§
3582(c)(2)
(2012)
motion
for
a
sentence
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
United States v. Craig, No. 6:02-cr-01358-HMH-8
(D.S.C. Apr. 20, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?