Keith Webb-El v. Timothy Stewart
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Emergency Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999660108-2], and denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999623691-2]. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-01510-PWG. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999681496]. Mailed to: Keith Webb-El. [15-6986]
Appeal: 15-6986
Doc: 13
Filed: 10/20/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6986
KEITH BRYAN WEBB-EL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN TIMOTHY S. STEWART; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:15cv-01510-PWG)
Submitted:
October 15, 2015
Decided:
October 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Bryan Webb-El, Appellant Pro Se.
Ray Daniel McKenzie,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6986
Doc: 13
Filed: 10/20/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Keith
Bryan
Webb-El,
a
federal
prisoner,
appeals
the
district court’s order dismissing without prejudice for lack of
jurisdiction
his
28
U.S.C.
§ 2241
(2012)
petition.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Webb-El
v. Stewart, No. 8:15-cv-01510-PWG (D. Md. June 3, 2015).
We
deny as moot Webb-El’s motion and emergency motion for release
pending
facts
appeal.
and
materials
legal
before
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
because
presented
would
not
the
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?